This Would Have Been The Electoral Map If Bernie Sanders Had Run Against Trump

Published November 9, 2016
Updated August 21, 2017

Bernie Sanders Electoral Map 2016 Election

Donald Trump is officially the president-elect of the United States. And politics aside, many pundits are thoroughly surprised that it happened.

The New York Times, as recently as the day of the election, placed Trump’s chances of winning at just 15 percent. Even GOP insiders yesterday stated on the record that they believed that Hillary Clinton would win.

So, how did this happen? And, perhaps even more intriguingly, what might have happened if Trump had faced Bernie Sanders instead of Hillary Clinton?

In May, Trump himself famously stated the following:

And when we now go back and analyze the exit poll data from the Democratic primary in a few key swing states, it becomes abundantly clear why Trump didn’t want to face Sanders.

A closer look at the primary voting of white males — Trump’s strongest demographic base — in these states reveals that, had Sanders run, Trump likely would have lost.

In Michigan, for example, primary exit poll data shows that 56 percent of white males voted for Sanders. If we then consider how many white males vote in Michigan, we can extrapolate the data to conclude that Sanders would have won the overall vote in Michigan with about 48 percent of the vote compared to Trump’s 46.9 (as opposed to the 47.9 that Trump actually gained versus the 46.9 for Clinton).

Furthermore, if we analyze the data in the same way in a few other key states — while keeping the numbers in every other state as they were — we see similar swings in Sanders’ favor that very likely would have handed the presidency to the Democrats:

Wisconsin

    Primary voting for Sanders among white males: 60 percent
    Sanders’ hypothetical statewide performance against Trump: 49.7 percent Sanders, 47 percent Trump

Ohio

    Primary voting for Sanders among white males: 57 percent
    Sanders’ hypothetical statewide performance against Trump: 47.9 percent Sanders, 47.7 percent Trump

Iowa

    Primary voting for Sanders among males (Data for white males specifically unavailable): 50 percent
    Sanders’ hypothetical statewide performance against Trump: 48.2 percent Sanders, 47.6 percent Trump

Pennsylvania

    Primary voting for Sanders among white males: 50 percent
    Sanders’ hypothetical statewide performance against Trump: 50.5 percent Sanders, 46.2 percent Trump

New Hampshire

    Primary voting for Sanders among white males: 67 percent
    Sanders’ hypothetical statewide performance against Trump: 51.5 percent Sanders, 45.4 percent Trump

Taken together, these victories would have been more than enough to give Sanders the presidency. What’s more, actual polling data from several established sources taken throughout this year consistently showed that a Sanders/Trump matchup would have come out in Sander’s favor by a sizable margin.

Of course, it was Clinton that Trump faced, not Sanders, and here’s how the electoral map actually turned out:

Electoral Map Actual

author
All That's Interesting
author
Established in 2010, All That's Interesting brings together a dedicated staff of digital publishing veterans and subject-level experts in history, true crime, and science. From the lesser-known byways of human history to the uncharted corners of the world, we seek out stories that bring our past, present, and future to life. Privately-owned since its founding, All That's Interesting maintains a commitment to unbiased reporting while taking great care in fact-checking and research to ensure that we meet the highest standards of accuracy.
editor
John Kuroski
editor
John Kuroski is the editorial director of All That's Interesting. He graduated from New York University with a degree in history, earning a place in the Phi Alpha Theta honor society for history students. An editor at All That's Interesting since 2015, his areas of interest include modern history and true crime.